Bourbon Food Pairing 101

Want to make your bourbon taste even better—without spending a penny more on it? Do that by pairing bourbon with food. Wine’s gotten the food-pairing nod for centuries, and for good reason: It’s made for food. But bourbon—any good whiskey, really—is wo…

Want to make your bourbon taste even better—without spending a penny more on it? Do that by pairing bourbon with food. Wine’s gotten the food-pairing nod for centuries, and for good reason: It’s made for food. But bourbon—any good whiskey, really—is worthy of the same role. Trust me. I made this discovery seven years ago when proofing the manuscript of my first book on country ham. It was late, I was hungry and I shuffled off to the fridge for some paper-thin slices of country ham. On my desk was a bottle of bourbon—not sure why it was there, maybe it was queued for a later review—and I poured some to have with the ham. (That’s a risky venture when proofreading, but hey, it was midnight. I needed to wind down.)

Four Roses 2021 Limited Edition Small Batch Bourbon

I’d like to thank the folks at Four Roses for providing this review sample to me with no strings attached.

I’d like to thank the folks at Four Roses for providing this review sample to me with no strings attached.

IMAGE: Inside the Media Sample packaging for Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch 2021

Oh my goodness! I am so excited! I’m sitting here in my gold top and maroon shorts because BigTen Football starts tonight when the Minnesota Golden Gophers host the Ohio State Buckeyes.

Ok, fans of teams that played on Saturday will say that it really started when Illinois kicked off to Nebraska sometime after 12 noon on the 28th. But, “Week 0?” come on…even the powers that be knew that it didn’t start until this week. And if those Nebraska fans watched the same debacle…err…game I did, well I’m guessing they would also like to forget that stinker of a game.

So since my beloved Golden Gophers are hosting the number 4 team in the country tonight in Ohio State, I get the added bonus of having zero pressure while watching the game. Usually, I hope for a win and worry about a loss. Tonight I know we will get blown out so I can just enjoy watching my Gophers without the pressure of hoping we win. I plan to enjoy it. Maybe I’ll even enjoy a small pour of the bourbon we are looking at tonight after the game ends. Either as consolation or as a celebration.

Yeah, I know it’ll be the former but let’s not get negative.

So what is tonight’s bourbon? Well, that would be the 2021 release of Four Roses Limited Edition Small Batch. This year it is made up of four of their bourbon recipes: a 16-year-old OESV, a 12-year-old OESK, a 14-year-old OBSQ, and a 16-year-old OBSV. I love that floral/herbal/fruity note that the Q yeast brings. If I see a Q or an F yeast used in a Single Barrel Pick while out shopping, it always comes home with me. It just hits the right notes with my palate. So I’m pretty excited to see this one included in the blend.

The suggested retail price is $150 per bottle. It’ll roll out to retailers in September, but if you are feeling lucky, and will be able to make it to Kentucky to pick it up in the last half of September they will be having a lottery drawing to purchase a bottle at the distillery gift shop. Visit the Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition website between August 31 and September 12 to enter.

Four Roses 2021 Limited Edition Small Batch Bourbon

Purchase Info: This sample was provided by the producer for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $150.

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $10.00

Details: 57.2% ABV. Features a 16-year-old OESV, a 12-year-old OESK, a 14-year-old OBSQ, and a 16-year-old OBSV.

Nose: Cinnamon, JuicyFruit gum, caramel, oak, leather, and vanilla.

Mouth: Red fruits, caramel, vanilla, cinnamon, clove, leather, and tobacco.

Finish: Long and warm with notes of cinnamon candies, JuicyFruit gum, leather, and oak.

Thoughts: Shows off much more oak than any of the standard releases from Four Roses. which is either a good or bad thing depending on how much oak you like. I’m digging the fruity/floral notes that the Q yeast is bringing. It’s one of my favorites to pick up when I find it as a single-barrel pick of Four Roses. My wife loves this one. I really like it, but it’s showing just a touch too much oak for me. Don't get me wrong, it is very good. And if I happen to be chosen in a lottery to buy one, I’ll probably jump at the chance.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, posters, and more.

Bid Now on an Exclusive Blanton’s Barrel Pick Experience, for a Worthy Cause

 (NOTE: I usually don’t promote this sort of thing, but it’s a cool opportunity and the money goes to a worthy cause. It’s personal because the daughter of a friend of mine has this condition. Click here to jump straight to the auction.)This aucti…

 


(NOTE: I usually don't promote this sort of thing, but it's a cool opportunity and the money goes to a worthy cause. It's personal because the daughter of a friend of mine has this condition. Click here to jump straight to the auction.)

This auction is being conducted by Unicorn Auctions in Chicago. It benefits The MOG Project, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization devoted to advocating for those all over the world who are diagnosed with the rare neuroimmune condition, Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Disease (MOGAD).

MOGAD causes inflammation primarily in the optic nerve but can also affect the spinal cord and brain. MOG is a protein located on the surface of myelin sheaths in the central nervous system. Because of the rare nature of the disorder, it is often misdiagnosed or not diagnosed at all. It affects people of all ages but is especially found in young children.

The MOG Project is devoted to raising awareness, educating doctors, patients and caregivers, advancing research through expert collaboration and fundraising, and providing support and advocacy for our community in hopes of finding a cure.

As the highest bidder, you will start with a visit to Buffalo Trace Distillery in Frankfort, Kentucky. Upon your arrival, you’ll be taken on an extensive, behind-the-scenes tour where you will learn about the rich history of distilling.

Following your personal tour, you will sample directly from several barrels of Blanton’s chosen especially for you by industry experts and learn firsthand about the inimitable magic that happens in Kentucky warehouses.

You’ll taste straight from the barrel, cut down to bottling proof, while the natural aromas and distinct flavors shine through. After you find the barrel that best reflects your discerning taste you’ll be able to mark that exact barrel as your very own and send it on its way to bottle and personalize.

Selecting your very own barrel of Blanton’s is an experience of a lifetime. With demand for one of the distillery’s most popular brands outpacing supply, owning an entire barrel is a rarity for even the biggest of bourbon fans.


Glenlivet 80 Year Old

Louis de Salignac ’75 Years Old Fine Champagne’ (OB, cognac, 1950s) – Glenlivet 80 Year Old 1940/2020 (44.9%, Gordon & MacPhail ‘Generations’, cask #340, 1st fill sherry butt, 250 bottles)

Louis de Salignac '75 Years Old Fine Champagne' (OB, cognac, 1950s) - Glenlivet 80 Year Old 1940/2020 (44.9%, Gordon & MacPhail 'Generations', cask #340, 1st fill sherry butt, 250 bottles)

Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit: 2020 Travel-Retail Exclusive

On the surface, there’s nothing particularly unique about this travel-retail Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit, save for its box and bottle size.
The post Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit: 2020 Travel-Retail Exclusive appeared first on Rare Bird 101.

On the surface, there’s nothing particularly unique about this travel-retail Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit, save for its box and bottle size.

The post Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit: 2020 Travel-Retail Exclusive appeared first on Rare Bird 101.

Dalmore Tweet Tasting – The Flavour Edition

Continuing our teeming throng of industry leading Tweet Tastings (the original series of virtual tastings) we’re delighted to announce that on September 29th, we’re teaming up again with our good friends at The Dalmore Distillery, to pour and explore a…

Continuing our teeming throng of industry leading Tweet Tastings (the original series of virtual tastings) we’re delighted to announce that on September 29th, we’re teaming up again with our good friends at The Dalmore Distillery, to pour and explore a dramboree of deliciousness, in our Dalmore Tweet Tasting – The Flavour Edition!On the night we’ll be pouring and exploring Dalmore’s Port Wood and

Allotment Drams / Starward Two-Fold & Power’s John’s Lane 12 years old

We have two more episodes from our Allotment Dram series. Within this we record whisky reviews in the surroundings of our north London allotment. For these two new episodes we have gone Australian and Irish. First, watch as Matt talks about the Starwar…

We have two more episodes from our Allotment Dram series. Within this we record whisky reviews in the surroundings of our north London allotment. For these two new episodes we have gone Australian and Irish. First, watch as Matt talks about the Starward Two-Fold - a whisky made from berley and wheat at the Melbourne-based distillery. Discover some background behind the distillery and bottling before finding our his thoughts and tasting notes.

Then on his next visit he takes a look at the Power's John's Lane 12 years old, a classic single pot still whiskey from the famous old Irish brand. Learn a bit about the history of Power's and its old distillery in John's Lane, Dublin. Then he pours a dram, so discover his thoughts and tasting notes.

To keep up-to-date with new episodes or to catch up with our other videos, then please visit or subscribe to our YouTube channel - click here.






#AllotmentDram

Whiskey Men Fighting the Whiskey Trust II

 

Foreword:  The heyday of attempts at monopolies in the America whiskey trade was relative short.  Two were important:  A Midwest “Trust” organized in 1887 and centered in Illinois that failed by 1898 through bad management and a Kentucky/New York cartel begun in the 1890s that flourished until about 1910, then essentially stalled.  Remnants, however, hung around until 1920 when National Prohibition was imposed.  Among the many problem the Trusts faced was active opposition by distillers and whiskey “rectifiers” (blenders) to their attempts to “corner the market” and drive up liquor prices.  Below are brief stories of whiskey men who opposed the monopolists and helped bring them down.


Described by his hometown newspaper as “irrepressible” and “indispensable,” to the Kansas City business community, Max Reefer, shown here, had been in the liquor business for three years when the first Whiskey Trust appeared.  An immigrant from Austria, he began his career in the U.S. as an advertising guru.  After the  birth of his first child in 1863, Reefer with his family moved from St. Louis 250 miles west across Missouri to Kansas City.  There, at the age of 33, he set up a liquor house, calling it “Green Mountain Distillery.”  His business plan was to advertise his whiskey repeatedly in national magazines where he emphasized mail order sales.  The plan worked and Reefer built a large  clientele.


He soon came in conflict with the Whiskey Trust.  Reefer was not a distiller, but a “rectifier,” that is, receiving whiskey by the barrel, blending it on his premises, and bottling it under his own label for shipping.  Rectifiers often found themselves at the mercy of the Whiskey Trust.  The Trust controlled a large percentage of existing whiskey stocks and hiked prices to the blenders.  If they refused to pay, they ultimately ran out of raw product, adding to whiskey shortages — the delight of the Trust.  As Reefer knew, the Trust would have been very happy to put Green Mountain and its owner out of business.  


Reefer struck back.  Apparently able to obtain enough liquor for his blends, he advertised vigorously that he could undersell the Trust.  “The whiskey we send is distilled from the purest grain (no seconds), is matured and ripened in wood and will cost you but a few cents over $2.00 per gallon.  We guarantee that no Trust house ever sold the same quality goods for less than $3.00 to $4.00.”   He went a step further by stating his anti-Trust views on his whiskey labels.  To his dying day at age 68 in 1916 Reefer maintained his attack on the Trusts and likely watched with some glee as th declined.


A major target of the monopolists were Kentucky distillers, among them J. W. Morton Field of Owensboro.  His small distillery, shown below, had attracted the attention of the KY/NY Trust.  “Front men” offered to buy 3,000 barrels of whiskey from J. W. M. Field & Sons over five years and then, under specified conditions, an additional 5,000 barrels annually over the next ten years.  Field could produce only 500 barrels for his own use and sale.  If he exceeded that amount, he would pay a penalty of $5 per barrel.  Believing there would be great advantage in having a guaranteed customer for his whiskey for 15 years,  the Owensboro distiller agreed. 


 


As the Trust’s power grew, some Kentucky distillers had begun to balk at the idea of a whiskey monopoly.  Field was among them.  When the pseudo buyers demanded he agree to transferring his contract to the Trust, he said an emphatic NO. In retaliation for Field’s refusal, they refused to take any more of his production, leaving the Owensboro distiller with unsold stocks.  Seemingly with no other choice, Field sued in 1902.  He had the wisdom to hire as his attorney, William Lindsay, a former chief justice of the Kentucky Supreme Court.   Although the suit was filed in the U.S. Circuit Court in New York, not in Kentucky, Lindsay persuaded the jury to give the distiller a judgment for damages in the amount of $50,000 (equiv. $1.25 million today).  It was a decisive blow against the Trust.  


Although J.W.M. Field & Co had won, the joy of victory was short-lived for Mort Field.  In August of 1903, he died at the age of 58.   Moreover,  family elation at having beaten the monopoly was short-lived when the  “deep pockets” Trust appealed the decision to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  This time Lindsay was not as effective. That panel decided that the whiskey the Fields could not sell and had stored in his warehouses actually was an asset, gaining value as it aged.  Thus no damage had been done to the Owensboro distiller.  The court nixed the payment and called for a new trial.  There is no evidence that it ever occurred. 


The Wathen family were whiskey pioneers in Kentucky whose interaction with the  KY/NY Trust, known officially as the Kentucky Distilleries and Warehouse Company, were, simply put, “convoluted.”  Three Wathen brothers in 1880 built a large distillery in Louisville.  They experienced great success and reinvested in the company by installing one of the first continuous column stills in Kentucky and steam heat in the warehouses.  J. A. Wathen joined his brothers in 1887 to manage the facility.



In April, 1899, for reason unknown, the Wathens sold the distillery to the Trust.  After the sale J. A. Wathen stayed with organization as an employee.  In a gambit that likely occasioned uncomfortable sibling interactions, his brother J. B. Wathen masterminded the formation of a new distillery for his young sons – called “R. E. Wathen & Co.” named after his eldest boy, only 22 at the time. This facility immediately began to compete with Trust.  The new Wathen distillery used the brand names “Ky. Credential” and “Honeycomb.”  Those labels sounded suspiciously like the brand names “Ky. Criterion” and “Honeymoon,” that the Wathen family had sold to the Trust along with their distillery.


In 1901 the Trust asked for an injunction on the Wathens’ further use of the brands.  During the trial the Trust’s lawyers conceded that the liquor wholesalers and others obtaining these products likely were not confused by the similarity of names used by the new Wathen distillery, but argued that the labels still represented an infringement.  In an expansion of brand name rights, the court agreed, enjoining the Wathens from using “Ky. Credential” and “Honeycomb.”  The ruling held that the brands unfairly impinged on the brands just acquired by the Trust, “even though consumers were not necessarily deceived.”  


Although the Wathens had lost this fight, as author Brian Haraa has expressed it, the family had administered the Trust “a clear “poke in the eye.”


Note:  The Wathen story is adapted from a post by Atty. Brian Haraa on his “Sippin’ Corn” blog.  Brian graciously agreed to my reprinting his piece on this blog where it appeared August 1, 2020.   He treats the Wathen family at greater length in his informative 2018 book, “Bourbon Justice:  How Whiskey Law Shaped America.”   Longer accounts appear at this website on Max Reefer, March 17, 2019, and J.W. Morton Field, January 31, 2016.









  

 

Foreword:  The heyday of attempts at monopolies in the America whiskey trade was relative short.  Two were important:  A Midwest “Trust” organized in 1887 and centered in Illinois that failed by 1898 through bad management and a Kentucky/New York cartel begun in the 1890s that flourished until about 1910, then essentially stalled.  Remnants, however, hung around until 1920 when National Prohibition was imposed.  Among the many problem the Trusts faced was active opposition by distillers and whiskey “rectifiers” (blenders) to their attempts to “corner the market” and drive up liquor prices.  Below are brief stories of whiskey men who opposed the monopolists and helped bring them down.


Described by his hometown newspaper as “irrepressible” and “indispensable,” to the Kansas City business community, Max Reefer, shown here, had been in the liquor business for three years when the first Whiskey Trust appeared.  An immigrant from Austria, he began his career in the U.S. as an advertising guru.  After the  birth of his first child in 1863, Reefer with his family moved from St. Louis 250 miles west across Missouri to Kansas City.  There, at the age of 33, he set up a liquor house, calling it “Green Mountain Distillery.”  His business plan was to advertise his whiskey repeatedly in national magazines where he emphasized mail order sales.  The plan worked and Reefer built a large  clientele.


He soon came in conflict with the Whiskey Trust.  Reefer was not a distiller, but a “rectifier,” that is, receiving whiskey by the barrel, blending it on his premises, and bottling it under his own label for shipping.  Rectifiers often found themselves at the mercy of the Whiskey Trust.  The Trust controlled a large percentage of existing whiskey stocks and hiked prices to the blenders.  If they refused to pay, they ultimately ran out of raw product, adding to whiskey shortages — the delight of the Trust.  As Reefer knew, the Trust would have been very happy to put Green Mountain and its owner out of business.  


Reefer struck back.  Apparently able to obtain enough liquor for his blends, he advertised vigorously that he could undersell the Trust.  “The whiskey we send is distilled from the purest grain (no seconds), is matured and ripened in wood and will cost you but a few cents over $2.00 per gallon.  We guarantee that no Trust house ever sold the same quality goods for less than $3.00 to $4.00.”   He went a step further by stating his anti-Trust views on his whiskey labels.  To his dying day at age 68 in 1916 Reefer maintained his attack on the Trusts and likely watched with some glee as th declined.


A major target of the monopolists were Kentucky distillers, among them J. W. Morton Field of Owensboro.  His small distillery, shown below, had attracted the attention of the KY/NY Trust.  “Front men” offered to buy 3,000 barrels of whiskey from J. W. M. Field & Sons over five years and then, under specified conditions, an additional 5,000 barrels annually over the next ten years.  Field could produce only 500 barrels for his own use and sale.  If he exceeded that amount, he would pay a penalty of $5 per barrel.  Believing there would be great advantage in having a guaranteed customer for his whiskey for 15 years,  the Owensboro distiller agreed. 


 


As the Trust’s power grew, some Kentucky distillers had begun to balk at the idea of a whiskey monopoly.  Field was among them.  When the pseudo buyers demanded he agree to transferring his contract to the Trust, he said an emphatic NO. In retaliation for Field’s refusal, they refused to take any more of his production, leaving the Owensboro distiller with unsold stocks.  Seemingly with no other choice, Field sued in 1902.  He had the wisdom to hire as his attorney, William Lindsay, a former chief justice of the Kentucky Supreme Court.   Although the suit was filed in the U.S. Circuit Court in New York, not in Kentucky, Lindsay persuaded the jury to give the distiller a judgment for damages in the amount of $50,000 (equiv. $1.25 million today).  It was a decisive blow against the Trust.  


Although J.W.M. Field & Co had won, the joy of victory was short-lived for Mort Field.  In August of 1903, he died at the age of 58.   Moreover,  family elation at having beaten the monopoly was short-lived when the  “deep pockets” Trust appealed the decision to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  This time Lindsay was not as effective. That panel decided that the whiskey the Fields could not sell and had stored in his warehouses actually was an asset, gaining value as it aged.  Thus no damage had been done to the Owensboro distiller.  The court nixed the payment and called for a new trial.  There is no evidence that it ever occurred. 


The Wathen family were whiskey pioneers in Kentucky whose interaction with the  KY/NY Trust, known officially as the Kentucky Distilleries and Warehouse Company, were, simply put, “convoluted.”  Three Wathen brothers in 1880 built a large distillery in Louisville.  They experienced great success and reinvested in the company by installing one of the first continuous column stills in Kentucky and steam heat in the warehouses.  J. A. Wathen joined his brothers in 1887 to manage the facility.



In April, 1899, for reason unknown, the Wathens sold the distillery to the Trust.  After the sale J. A. Wathen stayed with organization as an employee.  In a gambit that likely occasioned uncomfortable sibling interactions, his brother J. B. Wathen masterminded the formation of a new distillery for his young sons – called “R. E. Wathen & Co.” named after his eldest boy, only 22 at the time. This facility immediately began to compete with Trust.  The new Wathen distillery used the brand names “Ky. Credential” and “Honeycomb.”  Those labels sounded suspiciously like the brand names “Ky. Criterion” and “Honeymoon,” that the Wathen family had sold to the Trust along with their distillery.


In 1901 the Trust asked for an injunction on the Wathens’ further use of the brands.  During the trial the Trust’s lawyers conceded that the liquor wholesalers and others obtaining these products likely were not confused by the similarity of names used by the new Wathen distillery, but argued that the labels still represented an infringement.  In an expansion of brand name rights, the court agreed, enjoining the Wathens from using “Ky. Credential” and “Honeycomb.”  The ruling held that the brands unfairly impinged on the brands just acquired by the Trust, “even though consumers were not necessarily deceived.”  


Although the Wathens had lost this fight, as author Brian Haraa has expressed it, the family had administered the Trust “a clear “poke in the eye.”


Note:  The Wathen story is adapted from a post by Atty. Brian Haraa on his “Sippin’ Corn” blog.  Brian graciously agreed to my reprinting his piece on this blog where it appeared August 1, 2020.   He treats the Wathen family at greater length in his informative 2018 book, “Bourbon Justice:  How Whiskey Law Shaped America.”   Longer accounts appear at this website on Max Reefer, March 17, 2019, and J.W. Morton Field, January 31, 2016.































  

A wee journey among the Nordics

Fary Lochan 2012/2017 ‘Forar Batch #02’ (47%, OB, Denmark, 1500 bottles)Fary Lochan 2014/2021 (60.9%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, Nordic Casks #1, hogshead, cask #6, 243 bottles)Stauning ‘Kaos’ (46%, OB, Denmark, +/-2021)Stauning ‘Bastard’ (46.3%, OB, Denmark,…

Fary Lochan 2012/2017 'Forar Batch #02' (47%, OB, Denmark, 1500 bottles)
Fary Lochan 2014/2021 (60.9%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, Nordic Casks #1, hogshead, cask #6, 243 bottles)
Stauning 'Kaos' (46%, OB, Denmark, +/-2021)
Stauning 'Bastard' (46.3%, OB, Denmark, +/-2020)
Smogen 6 yo 2014/2021 (58.5%, OB, Exclusive to Germany, Sweden, PX hogsheads, cask #41+42, 852 bottles)
High Coast 'H' (51%, OB, Sweden, Silent Mills Collection 03 Svano, 2021)
High Coast 2013/2021 (60.9%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, Sweden, Nordic Casks #1, hogshead, cask #1384, 290 bottles)
High Coast 2015/2020 (63.6%, OB, for Taiwan Single Malt Club, 2nd fill Hungarian oak, 76 bottles)
Myken 2017/2021 (61.4%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, Norway, Nordic Casks #1, barrel, cask #15, 246 bottles)
Kyro 2016/2021 (54.6%, Berry Bros. & Rudd, Finland, Nordic Casks #1, barrel, cask #16037, 256 bottles)
Teerenpeli 7 yo (70.5%, OB for Kirsch Import, Finland, sherry, cask #09122013A, 276 bottles)

Sipp’n Corn Tasting Notes: 2021 Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition.

Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition is routinely one of the most anticipated limited edition bourbons in the September release season because Four Roses has so much flexibility with its ten recipes and variety of ages, so it’s always unique.  This year I tasted…

Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition is routinely one of the most anticipated limited edition bourbons in the September release season because Four Roses has so much flexibility with its ten recipes and variety of ages, so it’s always unique.  This year I tasted the Small Batch Limited Edition with Master Distiller Brent Elliott and a dozen lucky recipients of samples.

I asked Brent whether it was intentional to keep the high-rye “B” mash bill so restricted here, to less than 20%.  The lower-rye (but still higher rye than almost every other distillery) “E” mash bill historically is used more often for the limited editions.  Brent said that he really did not focus on the rye content, and instead is more focused on the yeast.  The “K” and “V” yeasts are perennial favorites and used extensively each year.  This year, the big news is the use of “Q,” albeit at only 6%.  But, as Brent explained, a little bit of Q goes a long way.

2021 Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition Tasting Notes

Bourbon:        Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey
Distillery:       Four Roses, Lawrenceburg, Kentucky
Recipes:         
16-year OBSV – 13%  
16-year OESV – 58%
14-year OBSQ – 6%
12-year OESK – 23%
ABV:              57.2% (114.4 proof)
Cost:               $150.00

Appearance:
Brown with a reddish glint.

Nose:
Brown sugar, caramel, dark chocolate, candy apple, and leather create mouth-watering aromas.

Taste:
The flavors are incredibly well balanced with plenty of sweetness like butterscotch, more brown sugar, and honey, combined with a firm antique oak backbone, probably from the OESV, and this oak really drives the overall experience.  The “youngest” component—the 12-year OESK—brings vibrancy and spice, but not as much of the rich berry flavors that Four Roses knows so well.  And even at just 6%, the OBSQ pronounces its inclusion with candied sweetness and baked cinnamon apples, but the age mellowed the Q’s floral notes.

Finish:
The finish is long and layered with complexity.  It unfolds with cinnamon and vanilla, and the last few sips—after plenty of chance to open up—shifts more to chocolate and dark cherries.

Bottom Line
Brent and his team have another home run this year with Q continuing to shine, just like it has in the single barrel program, with uniqueness that makes this limited edition stand out from its peers.  With only 14,500 bottles they’ll be difficult to find, but this Four Roses Small Batch Limited Edition will also be available at the distillery gift shop through a lottery system open online to the public.  Good luck in the lottery!

Disclaimer: The brand managers kindly
sent me a sample for this review,
without any strings attached. 
Thank you.