We Bring You, The News!

In an effort to continue our focus on giving you the primary sources whenever possible, we’ve started a new page on the site: News! We wanted to be able to bring you the latest (confirmed) bourbon news, yet keep the main page clutter-free and limited to podcasts, content pieces, and the occasional review. Our solution is…

In an effort to continue our focus on giving you the primary sources whenever possible, we’ve started a new page on the site: News! We wanted to be able to bring you the latest (confirmed) bourbon news, yet keep the main page clutter-free and limited to podcasts, content pieces, and the occasional review. Our solution is the new page you can link to on the top bar of the site, or click HERE for a direct link. This page will include news on new releases, bourbon industry news, media pieces we think are worth a read, etc. Our commentary on them will be limited to none, so you can go read for yourselves and make your own decisions. The main page will continue to harbor all of our bourbon-laiden sass, if that’s what you prefer. And honestly, that’s what you come here for right? This is a work in progress, and we’ll probably tailor it to your feedback, so let us know what you think. Cheers fellow Bourbon Evangelists!

New TTB Whiskey Labeling Guidelines

If you’ve been paying any attention in the last year, you’ve heard of all the hubbub about correctly labeling whiskey, and more specifically bourbon. A lot of this has had to do with where something is distilled versus where it is produced/bottled. We’re looking at you Templeton Rye. Something that has been somewhat more nebulous…

If you’ve been paying any attention in the last year, you’ve heard of all the hubbub about correctly labeling whiskey, and more specifically bourbon. A lot of this has had to do with where something is distilled versus where it is produced/bottled. We’re looking at you Templeton Rye. Something that has been somewhat more nebulous is the correct stating of age in whiskey. You’d think this is pretty straight forward, but there is a lot of creative wording out there. Presumably in an effort to combat this, the TTB has come out with new phrasing for its guidelines. Thanks to Chuck Cowdery for the heads up on his blog. I’ll put the new wording below it’s found in the FAQ section of the TTB site.

The most interesting thing I noticed is that any product labelled as ‘whisk(e)y’ must have an age statement if it is less than 4 years old. Down to the hour if applicable. Previously, I think this only applied to whiskies that have been labelled ‘straight’ that were less than 4 years old and any whiskey less than 2 years old. This seems to suggest that this now applies to any whiskey product less than 4 years old.

They also define the aging statement as referring to time in ‘new oak containers’ for any ‘straight’ product. I suppose this is to prevent counting any aging in a barrel finished process. I’m not aware of anyone putting straight whiskey into used barrels later in the aging process and counting that towards the age, but this seems logical to prevent this kind of nefarious behavior.

It also adds specific examples at the bottom of how to label blended whiskies. Not so applicable to us Bourbon Evangelists, but interesting none the less that they felt it necessary.

What do you guys think about this? Personally I’m for anything that gives me the opportunity to be more confident of what I’m actually drinking. Does anyone else wish that Bottled-in-Bond would make a come back?

New Wording of Whiskey Labeling  

Is an age statement required on a whisky label?
The TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.40(a) require an age statement on the label of any whisky that has not been aged for at least four years. This requirement applies to any whisky produced by mixing or blending if the youngest whisky in the mixture or blend has been aged for less than four years. An age statement is optional for any whisky that is four years old or more, unless the label makes a representation as to age or maturity. See 27 CFR 5.40(e)(2) for rules applying to age, maturity, and similar representations.

What is the “age” of a whisky?
The TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.11 define the term “age” to mean the period during which, after distillation and before bottling, distilled spirits have been stored in oak containers. For bourbon whisky, rye whisky, wheat whisky, malt whisky, or rye malt whisky, and for straight whisky other than straight corn whisky, the “age” is the period during which the whisky has been stored in charred new oak containers.

Do the format rules for mandatory age statements also apply to optional age statements?
The regulations at 27 CFR 5.40(a)(5) provide that optional age statements must appear in the same form as required statements. See 27 CFR 5.40 and Chapter 8 of the Beverage Alcohol Manual (BAM) for additional information about optional age statements.

What information must be included in an age statement?
The age of the whisky must be stated in hours, days, months, or years, as appropriate. The age may be understated, but the age may not be overstated. See 27 CFR 5.40(a)(4) for the requirements regarding disclosure of aging in reused barrels for certain products.

How should age be stated if the whisky consists of a mixture or blend of whiskies with different ages?
If the whisky contains no neutral spirits, the age must be stated either as the age of the youngest whisky, or as a statement that includes the age of each whisky in the mixture or blend, and the percentage of that whisky in the mixture or blend. If percentages are listed, they must be based on the percentage of the finished product, on a proof gallon basis, contributed by each listed whisky, and the percentages listed must add up to 100%. If the whisky contains neutral spirits, see 27 CFR 5.40(a)(2) for rules that apply to statements of age and percentage.

Can the age statement include minimum or maximum ages?
As noted above, age may be understated, but may not be overstated. A minimum age (such as “aged at least __ years”) is acceptable, but a maximum age (such as “aged for less than ___ years”) is not acceptable.

I am bottling a straight whisky that consists of one straight whisky that has been aged for 3 years and another straight whisky that has been aged for 2 years. The older whisky makes up 60% of the mixture, on a proof gallon basis, and the younger whisky makes up the remaining 40%. Can I simply label the product as having been “Aged for less than 4 years”?
No. The statement “aged for less than 4 years” does not satisfy the requirements of 27 CFR 5.40 for an age statement, and it creates a misleading impression as to the age of the product. You may choose to label the product with an age statement that reflects the age of the youngest whisky (“Aged 2 years”) or you can set out the percentage of each whisky, with its age (60% straight whisky aged 3 years; 40% straight whisky aged 2 years”).

What are examples of acceptable formats for age statements?
The following formats are acceptable:
_____ years old.
____ months old.
Aged _____ years.
Aged at least ____ years.
Aged a minimum of ____ months.
Over ____ years old.
Aged not less than ____ years.
___% whisky aged __ years; __% whisky aged ___ years.

What are examples of age statements that are not acceptable?
TTB will not approve labels with the following age statements, because they list a maximum age instead of a minimum age, and thus may mislead consumers as to the age of the product:
Aged less than ____ years.
Under ____ years old.
Aged not more than ____ years.

Around the Barrel #1

Hello, fellow Bourbon Evangelists! We’re back with a little something new for you. Sort of like our version of the Fireside Chat, we bring you the first Around the Barrel cast! In an effort to record more often and get information to you in a more timely manner, we’ve decided to start doing some casts in-between…

2015-01-18 21.50.59

Hello, fellow Bourbon Evangelists! We’re back with a little something new for you. Sort of like our version of the Fireside Chat, we bring you the first Around the Barrel cast! In an effort to record more often and get information to you in a more timely manner, we’ve decided to start doing some casts in-between our large historical and scientific pieces. These will include news, events, bourbon reviews, commentary on the bourbon world, and anything else we get into while sippin’ around the barrel. We hope that this way we will have more time for our larger research pieces, as well as allow more time to rant quixotically about news, reviews, and miscellaneous bourbon culture. Let us know what you think in the comments, or on our Facebook and Twitter feeds!

Herein we talk about upcoming events, new releases, our coverage of the Bourbon Classic, the bourbon boom, non-distiller producers, and review some high-proof bourbons. For those of you playing at home, we review Old Grand Dad 114 Proof, Stagg Jr., and Willett 9 Year single barrel with some surprising results. Cheers!

Listen to the cast here:

Around the Barrel #1 1/18/15

Here are links to things we discuss in the cast:

Bourbon Classic

Derby Museum Legends Series

Bourbon Boom Statistics courtesy of the Courier-Journal

Maraschino Cherry Recipe – We recommend adding less Luxardo, some orange zest and about 1 tsp almond extract.

The Bourbon Classic

We can officially announce that we’ll be covering the Bourbon Classic February 20-21st in Louisville! This is basically bourbon nirvana, so we highly recommend you check it out. If you’re planning to come, let us know and we’ll meet up for some of the good stuff! More info to come later. Here’s the link! The…

The_Bourbon_Classic_Louisville

We can officially announce that we’ll be covering the Bourbon Classic February 20-21st in Louisville! This is basically bourbon nirvana, so we highly recommend you check it out. If you’re planning to come, let us know and we’ll meet up for some of the good stuff! More info to come later. Here’s the link!

The Bourbon Classic

Blind Wheated Bourbon Tasting by Chris

Greetings fellow Bourbon Evangelists! We’ve been mostly dark over the holidays. We’ve both been hanging out with family and I’ve been dealing with an obscene amount of paperwork. While we finish up Part 2 of the Prohibition extravaganza, I thought I’d post an interesting little activity I did over the break. I was perusing my…

Greetings fellow Bourbon Evangelists! We’ve been mostly dark over the holidays. We’ve both been hanging out with family and I’ve been dealing with an obscene amount of paperwork. While we finish up Part 2 of the Prohibition extravaganza, I thought I’d post an interesting little activity I did over the break.

I was perusing my collection and noticed a Very Special Old Fitzgerald 12 Year Old hiding in the back. Needing an excuse to open it, I decided to do a blind tasting with some things I had on hand. Since Heaven Hill, makers of Old Fitzgerald, are discontinuing their 1849 label and shunting this towards the newer Larceny brand, I figured that would make a good comparison. I  added some of the Weller line as a wheated baseline, and then couldn’t resist sticking Van Winkle Lot B 12 Year in to see where it shook out. I did the tasting blind, wrote down all my thoughts, and only then looked at the ‘answers’. So what you’re getting is a label-blind perspective on these bottles. Identity of each bourbon is at the bottom so you can read it blind, as I tasted, if you want. Enjoy!

2015-01-11 18.53.12

Number 1

Nose: Thick, syrupy, plenty of wood (more of the planty expression of wood rather than vanilla), hints of bananas, candied nuts

Taste: smooth, refined, brown sugar, red fruits/berries, toffee, something coconut or otherwise estery, medium length finish into nice barrel notes, good mouth feel (if a little thin), finish fades to slightly tannic black tea flavor

BBB Rating: 3 barrels (was a 3.5, but the lingering tannic/black tea ended up downgrading it)

Guess: Weller 12 Year Old

Number 2

Nose: something distinctly Beam-like/yeasty, bananas, some young moonshine notes, cashews

Taste: spearmint, lightly sweet, fair amount of corn, some baking spice (clove and allspice), pretty thin finish, faint barrel vanilla

Rating: 2.5 barrels, on par with Maker’s Mark

Guess: Larceny

Number 3

Nose: Very rich, vanilla, caramel, red fruits, something distinctly Buffalo Trace, spicy in the non-rye sense, reminds me of apple pie

Taste: full/fills the mouth, great esters (green apple/coconut), good barrel to round out the back, nice long mellowing finish that stays pleasant without getting tannic

Rating: 4 Barrels, slightly overpowering ethanol nose and taste nearly kept it at a 3.5

Guess: Weller Antique 107 Proof

Number 4

Nose: wet wood, backed with decent barrel notes, again something nutty/cashew, fruity and pleasing

Taste: leads with barrel and sweetness, ethanol there in a good way, vanilla and toffee fade into a nice almost butterscotch, medium to long finish that stays pleasent

Rating: 3 Barrels

Guess: Very Special Old Fitzgerald 12 Year Old

Number 5

Nose: thick syrupy nose, red fruits, candy, backed by good barrel, not too much ethanol, something slightly astringent, pleasant

Taste: creamy, good level of sweetness and barrel (vanilla/pralines), good esters (mostly coconut), medium to quick finish, much better balance than #1 despite similar flavors

Rating: 3.5 barrels

Guess: Van Winkle 12 Year Old Lot B

The Answers

1: Weller 12 Year Old

2: Very Special Old Fitzgerald 12 Year Old

3: Weller Antique 107 Proof

4: Larceny

5: Van Winkle Lot B 12 Year Old

Comments:

The Weller Antique was a major standout in this lineup, and my favorite overall. I was very surprised that I enjoyed the Larceny significantly more than the 12 Year Old Fitzgerald. Heaven Hill has done a great job selecting the barrels for this expression. Somewhat as expected, the Van Winkle had a more complex, and slightly more enjoyable nose and taste than the Weller 12 despite the same mash bill, but not nearly enough to account for the price/availability difference. Let us know if you guys have had similar experiences, cheers!

Old Taylor 6 Year: Then and Now

The Old Taylor brand of Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey has been around for quite a long time. It’s namesake, the revered Col. E. H. Taylor, Jr., was one of the most influential characters in the history of our much loved spirit. We briefly spoke on him and his role in the American antebellum bourbon boom…

The Old Taylor brand of Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey has been around for quite a long time. It’s namesake, the revered Col. E. H. Taylor, Jr., was one of the most influential characters in the history of our much loved spirit. We briefly spoke on him and his role in the American antebellum bourbon boom in the late 1800’s in our most recent full podcast on Prohibition, Part 1. Of particular note today, he essentially invented bourbon tourism, and much more information can be found in the classic book The Social History of Bourbon by Gerald Carson. Interestingly, some fellows have taken it upon themselves to restore to grandeur his original distillery in Woodford County, Kentucky.

But I digress. This is a battle between Old Taylor 6 year from 1985 (A Product of Jim Beam Distillery) and Old Taylor 6 year from the present day (Please note that the age statement has been dropped from Old Taylor at the current time, but there are still some age stated bottles out there to get your hands on before they’re gone for good). The present day bottle tasted below is LIKELY still a Jim Beam distillate, but I can’t be certain. In 2009, Buffalo Trace (Sazerac owned) bought the Old Taylor brand and then-current stock of barrels from Jim Beam (now Suntory [Japan] owned). This bottle being less than 4 years old is why I say LIKELY still a Beam distillate.


Old Taylor 6 year age-stated (of relatively recent purchase), 80 proof

oldtaylorcurrent

Nose: Nose a little flat, nothing overtly offensive; surprising for an inexpensive low-middle aged bourbon, low proof so not much alcohol sting either.

Taste: Flavors mostly decent. No overriding bad taste, actually, but just low on flavor in general which also is partly a function of the proof as well. HINTS of MILK chocolate and a trace of caramel, as well as a very slight hint of roasted or grilled corn removed, but not too far removed, from a young moonshine corn flavor, some wood flavors without being too overbearing or unpleasant. Long story short, there’s much worse out there in bargain bourbon land.

After a couple drops of water and a minute to sit, the nose actually really opened up with rich smooth aromas of the flavors that were only hinted at in the tasting. The nose after a little water was very surprising, one expected of a much more expensive bourbon.

Sadly, the taste did not improve with this. Not surprisingly less bold flavors, very lackluster.

Drink this neat or on ice after you’ve already had a few drinks of your favorite bourbon that night. Save it for mixing with Coke, or for after you’re already a sheet or so to the wind.

Rating: 1.5 Barrels
Rarity: Albino squirrel, but getting rarer as the age statement has been dropped.

(see our Rating and Rarity scale explanation)


Old Taylor 6 year age-stated, purchased in 1986, unopened at time of tasting, 86 proof (Jim Beam distillate)

oldtaylor86-5oldtaylor86-3

No nose notes.

Taste profile much bolder and richer tones of the same listed above. Smooth with a relative absence of the corn flavor and much less wood flavor. Still strong chocolate. I was blown away at what probably cost $8 in 1985 could easily sell for $25-30 today with a taste profile like this.

Rating: 2.5 Barrels solid.
Rarity: Unicorn (good luck finding a bottle of almost ANYTHING from 1985).

To sum up this little jaunt into the Old Taylor brand, What we’ve got here is a modern business issue. Lower the proof, produce more bottles. Lowering the proof also keeps the retail price down. Give and take. Additionally, after a lengthy search, it wasn’t apparent exactly when the proof was lowered on Old Taylor 6 year, though it may have been when Buffalo Trace began bottling it (~2009). After these tastings, I can say for sure that I wish they hadn’t.

To all our Bourbon Evangelists, Cheers!

Kentucky Bourbon Tales

In case you missed it, KET ran an excellent documentary on the people of the bourbon industry tonight called Kentucky Bourbon Tales. It is based on a multitude of interviews taken as an oral history project spearheaded by the Nunn Center at the University of Kentucky. Here is a link to future airings if you…

KBT-Logo-e1414086064769

In case you missed it, KET ran an excellent documentary on the people of the bourbon industry tonight called Kentucky Bourbon Tales. It is based on a multitude of interviews taken as an oral history project spearheaded by the Nunn Center at the University of Kentucky. Here is a link to future airings if you live in the KET viewing area. If not, never fear, you can see all of the interviews and more on their website here: http://nunncenter.org/bourbon/.

If you don’t like the short format they have on that site (like me), you can watch the full interviews on the University of Kentucky website here: http://www.kentuckyoralhistory.org/series/40472/kentucky-bourbon-tales. Pour yourself a bourbon, and get ready to have a good time! Cheers!

Better Ice: A New Hope, or Nope?

Update note: Use a glass with angles, i.e. not perfectly round, for best results. Bourbon Evangelists, a new dawn has come for bourbon on the rocks, er, rock, er, slant! In our unending quest for better ice, we made a post some time back about how to make clear ice, and this follows right along…

Update note: Use a glass with angles, i.e. not perfectly round, for best results.

Bourbon Evangelists, a new dawn has come for bourbon on the rocks, er, rock, er, slant! In our unending quest for better ice, we made a post some time back about how to make clear ice, and this follows right along the same lines: How to make your whole bourbon drinking experience even better not just by occasionally using ice if desired, but by using better ice. Clear ice certainly adds to the sophistication, but what about slanted ice in the glass? Will that improve anything, or will it detract from the water of life?

A new product is currently being marketed to whiskey enthusiasts who want their bourbon cold without it getting watered down: The Whiskey Wedge by Corkcicle. Their website, a few ads, and a few friends inspired us to try our own slanted-ice glasses and report what we found to our fellow Bourbon Evangelists. The theory is that it melts much slower than cubed ice, and therefore won’t water down your drink as much. We here at Bottom of the Barrel have taken it upon ourselves to see if these claims are true. Will ice slanted such as this work as advertised, or is it all hokum?

The Method:

Choose your favorite Old Fashioned/Rocks glass.

Fill it a little less than half full of water.

Set it at your preferred angle (usually 45 degrees or even more) and prop it securely in
your freezer. Bags of frozen vegetables work nicely, and so do the edges of frozen
pizzas!

manslant1

Wait patiently for a few hours while it freezes completely. It’s a good idea to set a couple glasses like this up in the morning so they are ready at night. And trust us, you’ll want to make more than one at a time.

Watch the second hand on the clock at work tick by slowly, then drive home normally.

Get one of the now totally frozen slanted ice glasses out of the freezer and pick out your favorite bourbon (a high proof bourbon is recommended, but try what you like!).

Pour a good 1.5 to 2 oz for a full test run.

manslant2

Drink as you normally would, or at least try.

We’ve found it gets your bourbon very, very cold, and it does indeed have less of a watering down effect than with regular ice cubes. Some of the alcohol burn even seems to be taken away just due to how cold it is. This has the end effect of increasing your drinking velocity, so be careful, and don’t over do it!

A quick run down of what we found, in no particular order…

Pros:

1) Ice cold bourbon without watering it down significantly.

2) It looks pretty darn cool.

3) No more ice hitting your teeth/face every drink (it stays put), so you don’t have to decide to eat the ice or spit it back in the glass like the slob you are.

4) It’s also fun to use gravity to your advantage for once instead of gravity always just holding you down.

Cons:

1) It’s ice cold which can and does mask some of the flavors.

2) The glass is really darn cold and frosty, which may or may not be desired.

3) Prep time (you have to plan in advance which is difficult for men especially).

4) If you prefer your bourbon to mellow with some ice, then this might not be the best way to drink it.

The end result is that slanted ice like this does make your bourbon colder and less watered down than most regular ice cubes. If you have large cubes, this might not be much of an improvement. If you make home made clear ice (our instructions for making clear ice) then you may or may not even be interested in this slanted ice shenanigans. For me, I’m going to experiment a little more with this, but I don’t see this as being my preferred drinking method. Try it yourself, and let us know what you, our loyal Bourbon Evangelists think!

Cheers!

manslant3

Last photo credit: Chas Jones, Esq.

So I Tried the NEAT Glass

http://theneatglass.com/thesciencebehindneatglass/ The NEAT glass, not Neat, NEAT. Got it? Naturally Engineered Aroma Technology. I guess N.E.A.T. isn’t as punny. Thanks to the kind folks at Big Earl’s Beverage Co. in Nicholasville, I had the chance to try this glass side by side with my trusty Glencairn. My first formal introduction to the glass was when I…

The Neat Glass

http://theneatglass.com/thesciencebehindneatglass/

The NEAT glass, not Neat, NEAT. Got it? Naturally Engineered Aroma Technology. I guess N.E.A.T. isn’t as punny. Thanks to the kind folks at Big Earl’s Beverage Co. in Nicholasville, I had the chance to try this glass side by side with my trusty Glencairn.

My first formal introduction to the glass was when I was forwarded an e-mail that came when Big Earl’s placed an order. Herein were detailed instructions on how to open the package that the glass comes in once you get it. Ok, really? Does this thing come in some sort of hermetically sealed Otterbox with booby traps? No, turns out it comes in a tube that most toddlers could figure out if they’ve ever ordered anything from Amazon (I hate clamshell packaging).

When you finally do open the package, assuming you are capable, you are greeted with detailed instructions on how to use the glass. In case you are interested, here they are:

It’s time | How to use your NEAT glass, a quick recap

  1. Fill to widest bowl diameter (about 1½ oz)
  2. Do not add water before evaluating aromas
  3. Hold at neck to avoid warming, or in your palm to warm (not too warm, now)
  4. Hold glass level, swirl, and place your nose over the “sweet spot” (see above diagram)
  5. Close mouth, inhale, ponder, evaluate
  6. Swallow, inhale slightly to detect finish aromas, evaluate

A little more complicated then BOTB’s patented instructions for a Glencairn:

  1. Pour bourbon into glass, however much you want, it probably doesn’t matter, just not all the way full, because no one likes spilled bourbon.
  2. Add water if you want. Or not, I’m not your mother.
  3. Hold glass however it fits your hand. I have no idea if your hands are ‘too warm’ or not, so hold it with caution. On second thought do you have a straw just in case?
  4. Smell the bourbon, probably somewhere near the glass.
  5. Maybe close your mouth if you’ve been sitting around with it agape for the last 10 minutes. See if you like the way it smells. The bourbon, not your mouth.
  6. Where some people will tell you to swallow without having drank anything (see above), we suggest you put some bourbon in your mouth in order to taste it.
  7. Contemplate this picture of the creators of the NEAT glass while you sip, and watch out for the guy on the right, he looks shifty.

NEAT-UNLV-Chemistry-Copy

Yes this is actually a picture from their website and not just a young Einstein.

http://theneatglass.com/howtouseneat/

The theory behind the glass is that it reduces the amount of alcohol reaching your nose, thus allowing you to smell the other properties of the drink better. As they put it, “Inhaling deeply, you immediately recoil from strong,painful nose burn and numbness.” Personally, I’ve never smelt a bourbon and felt like I just ate straight wasabi, but we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. There are two pages on their site dedicated to the science behind why the flared rim allows the alcohol out the sides and the other flavors up through the middle. The one called “The Science” is fairly short and simple if you want to take a look. Alternatively, the one called “Geek Science” is a massive diatribe telling you all about how you drink whiskey incorrectly and using lots of big words. Herein they also tell you that you should always have an infrared thermometer to test the temperature of your bourbon and that the optimal temperature is “as low as 750 and rarely, up to 900F”. As soon as I can find a kiln, I’m going to try this, though I’m not sure how I’ll be able to get it out and into my mouth without it instantly evaporating. They even give you a pretty picture that shows how their glass stacks up to others:

Glass-Comparison-Wow-Copy-300x185

Look at all this science! Do you see how high their glass is on the WOW! scale. That’s like maximum wow! And look at that WordArt, so professional!

http://theneatglass.com/spiritsglasscomparison/

At this point I would like to point out the careful verbiage used throughout the site which states studies were conducted “at UNLV laboratories”. It never says anything was “performed by” or “tested by UNLV scientists”. There are no references or actual study results given anywhere on their site, but they took the glass to a lab so it’s totally legit. Also, the site clearly states that the glass’ shape was created by “an accident in a glass blowing class in 2003″. Very scientific.

OK, so, now having detailed instructions on how to open the package, how to use the glass, and being armed with the knowledge that I have been drinking incorrectly for years, I was ready to taste. For this comparison we used Old Forester 1870 and Larceny, in case you want to play along at home. In nosing the two glasses, I definitely did get more alcohol from the Glencairn. The ethanol smell I’m used to was, in fact, nearly completely missing once I got my nose in the “sweet spot” of the NEAT glass. Kudos to that, the accident worked. However, once I completed my second customary step of nosing in a Glencairn, which is to either let it sit a minute or gently blow into the glass to get rid of some of the ethanol, the difference was much less striking. Though definitely there, to be clear.

As far as tasting, I noticed little to no difference between the two glasses. I will say that on the Old Forester 1870 I was able to pick up some different notes on the nose from the NEAT glass (mainly a nice honey scent) that I didn’t get in the Glencairn that made me enjoy the subsequent sips more from both glasses. And to be honest, I did really enjoy drinking out of a comical spittoon shaped glass that requires you to put your head directly over it to get the “sweet spot”. But I like looking ridiculous, maybe you don’t.

So, the verdict? If you either frequently notice you’re smelling too much alcohol on the noses of your bourbons and don’t enjoy it, or just want to experience some of your favorites in a new way, I’d say give it a shot. It makes a great talking point and entertained me for a solid hour. I don’t think I will be buying one for myself, but would consider it for a tasting party. It does what it says, and I’m all for innovation. However, I did feel obligated to spend a great deal of this post pointing out the ridiculousness of their marketing and ‘science’. You’re not foolin’ us NEAT. Now go get your infrared thermometers, spend the next 30 minutes reading about how you’re supposed to drink bourbon, then heat it up to 900F and enjoy! Cheers!

The NEAT glass can be purchased here for $14.95. Or you can get two of them in a velvet lined lunchbox for $94.99, what a deal!

Our New Bourbon Rating And Rarity Scale

Sorry this took so long to get out, I’ve been procrastinating. Hopefully my Bourbon On The Shelf didn’t notice. Enjoy our new rating scales! Part 1 – Beautiful Bourbon Barrel Scale We are not, primarily, a bourbon review site. There are plenty of people already doing this, and doing it pretty well. We try to…

Sorry this took so long to get out, I’ve been procrastinating. Hopefully my Bourbon On The Shelf didn’t notice. Enjoy our new rating scales!

Part 1 – Beautiful Bourbon Barrel Scale

We are not, primarily, a bourbon review site. There are plenty of people already doing this, and doing it pretty well. We try to be predominantly about giving you in-depth information about all things surrounding bourbon. However, we like to drink bourbon, and have been continually frustrated by the use of 100 point scales where 75 is terrible and 95 is fantastic. What’s the point of the other 74 points on the scale? How am I, as a prospective bourbon purchaser, supposed to know what the difference between your 90 and 95 is? A 75 is a solid C in most scales, does this mean it’s decent, or you hate it with a passion? In an effort to combat this we have come up with what we feel is a straightforward, reliable way for us to communicate to you, the Bourbon Evangelists, how well we like something we’ve tasted. And as much as possible, we will try and keep availability, part 2 of our rating system, separate from this rating.

The scale is from 0-5 barrels with only half increments allowed. Below is how we’ve decided to break up our scale, and a few examples for reference:

0.5 Barrels – Essentially as low as the scale goes, as 0 would likely be actual turpentine. Our prototypical 0.5 Barrel bourbon is Yellowstone.

1 Barrel – This grade is for bottles that are recognizable as bourbon, but are probably relegated to emergencies such as open bars at weddings and airport bars in foreign counties. These will always need to be mixed to hide their evils. Examples include Jim Beam 4 year, Early Times, Old Crow, etc.

2 Barrels – Getting into voluntarily drinkable territory, these are bourbons that aren’t bad, but you’ll probably still want to mix them. Some may be OK on their own with ice. Not objectionable, but not something you’d seek out. Examples include things like Kentucky Tavern and Very Old Barton 80 Proof.

2.5 Barrels – For the middle of the scale we’ve selected Maker’s Mark as the benchmark for a solid, drinkable bourbon. Always consistent, always pleasant, this is what we use as a standard to help sort out the other rankings.

3 Barrels – This is where things start to get good. A 3 Barrel bourbon is something you’d want regularly on your shelf, and is generally versatile enough to use as a mixer or sipper. Not something that will wow your friends, but you’d be happy drinking it most anytime. Eagle Rare Small Batch (the new one) is around this range. When you move up to 3.5 Barrels you get into things like Elmer T. Lee and Knob Creek Single Barrel.

4 Barrels – 4 Barrel Bourbons are all around great. Likely something to be sipped neat or with a splash of water, these are special occasion type bottles that you’ll want to share with friends. If we give it 4 Barrels, we’re essentially telling you that you need to try it, and we’d darn near guarantee that you’ll like it. 4.5 Barrel bourbons are the best of what we’ve tasted.

5 Barrels – This rating is essentially unattainable and is reserved for masterpieces that envelop all of your senses. We’re not really sure we’ve ever tasted a 5 Barrel bourbon, but we’ll definite let you know when we do.

Part 2 – Rarity Scale

In addition to our Beautiful Bourbon Barrel Scale (the “BBB”), we wanted to add an indicator to let our fellow Bourbon Evangelists know just what to expect when trying to find some of the bourbons we are rating. With demand over the world for good bourbon growing daily, and a supply lag time of a good decade, this rarity scale, we feel, is a necessary addition to any bourbon rating system. Our BR system is the first and only one that exists with a supplementary availability rating system which makes this both ground breaking and record-setting in addition to extremely helpful.

Just like our 5 barrel BBB system for the quality of the bourbon, our rarity scale will be equally simple and informative. As we often refer to bourbon shopping as bourbon hunting, we have chosen five (5) animals which should be pretty darn intuitive to readers when it comes to common versus vanishingly rare. We’ve got our explanations below, as well as a few examples.

From most to least common:

Squirrel: Sciurus carolinensis

Squirrels are everywhere. In fact, the grey squirrel has essentially made the much more attractive and desirable red squirrel a very rare find. Squirrel bourbons don’t necessarily need to push out others for this rating, but that is a possibility merely due to the ubiquitous nature of the product.

Examples: Jim Beam (white label), Jack Daniels (“Tennessee Whiskey”)

Albino* examples: Maker’s Mark, Old Forrester, Ancient Age

*For this scale, an “albino” animal means somewhat less common than the normally-pigmented animal version, but not as rare as the next animal level higher. A .5 if you will.

Deer:     Odocoileus virginianus

Deer are very common, beautiful creatures. They are easy to find when hunting, but you have to know where to look. They usually aren’t running around during the afternoon, but they come out at night and can even be found roaming your suburban front yards. You just have to pay attention or you can easily miss them. A permit is not required for hunting a deer-rated bourbon, but it helps to know what field liquor stores carry them. Your run of the mill liquor store on the gas station off the interstate exit ramp generally won’t carry deer. Large chains and good independent liquor stores with knowledgeable staff carry these bourbons regularly with year-round availability.

Examples: Willett Pot Still, Bulleit, Knob Creek

Albino examples: Bulleit 10 year, Old Charter #8 (previously 8 year)

Bear:     Ursus americanus

The bear is a mighty animal. Mighty and sleepy. They hibernate for half the year! If you want to hunt a bear, you have to go out at the right time of the year. Everyone had a stuffed version to snuggle with which made them feel secure and warm. Bear bourbons are the same way. These are limited releases, generally once per year (eg. “The Fall release”). This means you have to plan your bourbon hunting trip, and know when hunting season is. Hunting for these out of season won’t land you in jail or fined for poaching, but it will probably get you a good chuckle from the liquor store staff/game warden at your expense. Bear-rated bourbons are usually high-quality and highly sought after bourbons which will generally come with a high BBB rating.

Examples: Old Forester Birthday Bourbon, Four Roses Limited Editions

Giraffe: Giraffa camelopardalis

Ah, the noble giraffe. These long-necked ungulates can only be found in Africa, a zoo, or the odd rock star’s back yard. As with bears, these are generally limited releases and often then only to specific geographic areas. To hunt giraffe bourbons, you have to first know they exist, know the release period/when hunting season is, plan a special trip to the Serengeti/special liquor store or distillery, and then in the end, it doesn’t hurt to capture a Leprechaun and get him to grant you a good luck wish.

Examples: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection, Michter’s 10 Year Single Barrel

Unicorn: Goodluck findingus

The unicorn is an allegedly mythical creature that is basically a horse with a horn on its head. They don’t exist, their meat may or may not contain sparkles, and they may or may not poop rainbows. Their bourbon counterparts would be next to nonexistent and would include test bottles from distillers, special bottles that only distillers/company big-wigs get for themselves, and other extra small productions.

Examples: Journeyman Reserve Rye (140 bottles made), Nectar bourbon accompanying ambrosia at a dinner at Zeus’ house, the 100-year-old bourbon bottles recently opened in Louisville

At the end of the day, a 5 Barrel Albino Unicorn doesn’t exist. We’ve purposefully designed this scale for accuracy, precision, and usability. It’s much more helpful than the esoteric 1-100 system or a generic star system with no guiding standards. We will be using this scale along with our BR scale to rate bourbons from here on out. Cheers!

Note bene: The examples above are subject to change due to the variability and unpredictable nature of the bourbon supply at this time.