A rain of Caol Ila including our 600th

Islay 11 yo 2008/2019 (53.1%, Liquor Library) – Caol Ila 12 yo (59.3%, Single Cask Nation, bourbon hogshead, cask #510, 2019) – Caol Ila 9 yo 2009/2019 (51.8%, North Star Spirits, PX finish, 378 bottles) – Caol Ila 12 yo 2006/2018 (51.6%, The Whisky Fa…

Islay 11 yo 2008/2019 (53.1%, Liquor Library) - Caol Ila 12 yo (59.3%, Single Cask Nation, bourbon hogshead, cask #510, 2019) - Caol Ila 9 yo 2009/2019 (51.8%, North Star Spirits, PX finish, 378 bottles) - Caol Ila 12 yo 2006/2018 (51.6%, The Whisky Fair, bourbon hogshead, 322 bottles) - Caol Ila 2010/2018 (58.3%, Or Sileis, Legends, oloroso hogshead, cask #HL16888, 292 bottles) - Caol Ila 9 yo 2009/2019 (58.7%, Elixir Distillers ?Magic Of The Cask?, cask #316103, refill Gonzalez Byass sherry, 308 bottles) - Caol Ila 9 yo 2009/2019 (46%, James Eadie, 1100 bottles) - Caol Ila 37 yo 1982/2019 (56.3%, Kingsbury for Club Qing Hong Kong, butt, cask #700)

Favorite Bourbons Of 2019

Welcome to the 2019 Bourbonr Year in review. I’ll dive into my favorite three bourbons a little later. For now, let’s recap what all went on this year. Probably the biggest story of 2019 is…

Welcome to the 2019 Bourbonr Year in review. I’ll dive into my favorite three bourbons a little later. For now, let’s recap what all went on this year.

Probably the biggest story of 2019 is the crackdown on the bourbon secondary market. Pappy has long dominated bourbon headlines. It’s the most notable bourbon brand in the world. When the Van Winkles stated that they spent millions to have the Facebook bourbon groups taken down it sent a shockwave through the bourbon world. No matter how you feel about the issue, this was huge.

Have I been wrong about Old Forester this whole time? I’ve often been critical of Old Forester products. I never understood why people loved Woodford. Old Forester Birthday Bourbon took a slide in quality after 2013. I wasn’t a fan of the first Whiskey Row Series release. Then all that started to change! I loved the 1920 release. It was followed by an even better 1910 release. Old Forester Birthday Bourbon increased the proof to 105 proof and it was my favorite OFBB in years. King of Kentucky was fantastic. Old Forester Straight Rye may be the best value on the market today. Old Forester is the distillery I’m most excited about heading into 2020. Especially, after they announced their new barrel program.

Smaller producers are only getting better. I have a vested interest in this category with Seelbach’s. But, we’re starting to see new(ish) distillers compete on quality, and sometimes quantity, the big boys. There’s still no reason to overpay for bourbon. If you’d like to try a craft distiller, here are a few of my favorite craft bourbons. You can find them here, here and here.

Now, let’s get to the rankings. These are my top 3 bourbons of 2019. I’ve ranked them based on an algorithm of taste, uniqueness, availability, and value. I must say, this was a great year for bourbon. I could have easily filled a top 7 or top 10 list. There were new widely available bottles. We saw several good options released at $30 less. Special releases were on point.

I did receive samples on some of these releases. However, all tasting notes listed below are from the bottles I purchased. Here’s the list:

Little Book Chapter 3

I’m a huge Booker fan. I love the idea and story behind the brand. Although the first two releases didn’t quite do it for me. That changed with Chapter 3! Chapter 3 is a blend 9-year-old Knob Creek, 9-year-old Basil Hayden’s, 11-year-old Booker’s, and 12-year-old Baker’s. It is uncut at 122.6 proof. The blend includes 11-year Booker’s and 12-year Baker’s?!

Most Bourbonr’s (at least I didn’t until last year) probably didn’t know that these different bourbons have a different production method. Knob Creek uses the standard Beam mash bill and comes off of the still at 130 proof. The bourbon is proofed down and enters the barrel at 125 proof. Booker’s and Baker’s share the same mash bill as Knob Creek. But, they come off of the still at 125 proof and go straight into the barrel. Basil Hayden’s is a different animal. It has a higher rye mash bill and comes off of the still at 127 proof. The bourbon is proofed down to enter the barrel at 125 proof.

This bourbon has everything I love. There is heat from the high proof. The distinctive Beam funk is there. There are notes of vanilla, caramel, mint and black pepper. The taste is full of dark and roasted notes.

W.B. Saffell

This is the third release from Wild Turkey’s Whiskey Barron’s select. The first two (Old Rippy and Bond & Lillard) were decent. I felt like they were overpriced. Because of that, I was a little late to the “Saffell” party. W.B. Saffell is a blend of 6, 8, 10, and 12-year bourbon. Once I finally tried Saffell I found out what the fuss was all about! The nose is fruit cobbler. There are notes of cinnamon, clove, brown sugar and buttered toast. The taste is rounded with caramel and some nice herbal notes. I get a little bit of pepper and cedar on the finish. It continues for a while with more honey and vanilla.

I’ve selected this release because of its uniqueness, historical importance, taste, and availability. I started the year by ignoring the release. I finished the year by grabbing every bottle I can find.

Maker’s Mark RC6

This is my final choice for my favorite whiskeys of 2019. This release is the first national limited edition release. I’ve long been a fan of the Maker’s Mark private barrels. They allow a unique experience to taste through the effects staves have on a bourbon. Maker’s Mark RC6 didn’t disappoint! There are tons of chocolate, dark cherry, and caramel notes. The proof balances nicely with the sweetness. The taste fades from sweet to a structured tannic note. The finish is long and oaky.

Why aren’t more people paying attention to this wheated bourbon? For as much craziness surrounds other wheated bourbons I don’t understand why Maker’s is often snubbed. This is a fantastic bourbon that is offered at a reasonable price. At least as we define “reasonable” in today’s bourbon world.

A lot changed in 2019. The good news is there are more distillers making good whiskey. The older distilleries are making more whiskey at a record pace. This keeps me hopeful of Bourbon’s future.

The 1792 Small Batch review

Company: Barton 1792Vol: 46.85%Age: No Age StatementClassification: Kentucky Straight Bourbon WhiskeyBreakdown: 75% corn, 15% rye, 10% malted barleyPrice: c. £45-50Preamble First published in September 2016, this was only our third ever review on the s…

Company: Barton 1792
Vol: 46.85%
Age: No Age Statement
Classification: Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey
Breakdown: 75% corn, 15% rye, 10% malted barley
Price: c. £45-50

Preamble

First published in September 2016, this was only our third ever review on the site. It’s short, succinct but, as always, true and honest. The History section was so short, Mr Pie must have written this before he was introduced to Google.

The Gents are both the perfect customers (victims) that bourbon marketers love to attract. The bottle shape & design is aesthetically pleasing and draws us into wanting to love this bourbon. The nose continues to deliver sweet candy, caramel fudge qualities and is reminiscent of childhood memories from your favourite sweet shop. From then on, it’s a helter-skelter ride of descent into a very average bourbon palate and finish.

Our lower than average score is supported by the fact that the bottle you see in the picture is still lurking around Mav’s home bar. On the upside, since the review, Mav has moved home twice and didn’t leave it behind. We would have loved to have tasted its previous incarnation, the 1792 Ridgemont Reserve. That is the original 8-year-old version and not the much-lamented no age statement version. The 1792 Limited Edition offerings continue to flourish and are added to regularly. Alongside the Single Barrel, Full Proof (Jim Murray’s 2020 World Whiskey of the Year), Sweet Wheat and Port Finish, there is now available a Bottled In Bond, High Rye and the most recently released (2019), Aged Twelve Years. It’s great to see 1792 introducing a now relatively uncommon 12-year-old bourbon, and its one we look forward to trying in the future.

Review Updated - January 2020

History

This bourbon was originally called 1792 Ridgewood Reserve. 1792 comes from the year in which the state of Kentucky joined the United States. In 2004 Brown Forman successfully sued Barton’s to change the name as they argued customers would confuse it with Woodford Reserve. It was then changed to 1792 Ridgemont Reserve, and sometime in 2015, the words Ridgemont Reserve were dropped and replaced with Small Batch!  There are 4 other limited release bed fellows to the 1792 collection. They are Single Barrel, Full Proof, Sweet Wheat, and Port Finish. The Barton 1792 distillery has been around since 1879 and is the oldest fully operating distillery in Bardstown, Kentucky.

The Review

For this review we drank it neat in a Glencairn glass

Nose

What we got - Sweet, caramel, fudge, like being in a sweet/candy shop, marshmallow (Mav), gentle and smooth.

What they say we should get - A palate of sweet honey and vanilla tones is balanced with orange and spice, hinting at the relatively high rye content. A few minutes in the glass lets the nose open up nicely. A distinct woodiness sits in the background

Palate

What we got - Spice & peppery, that's all we get! We tried, honestly we did

What they say we should get - Quite tannic and fairly peppery, with a heavily woody flavour profile. A hint of maple is noticeable, but more than anything, what stands out is the dry, tongue-coating mouthfeel

Finish

What we got – A hint of the sweet/candy comes back, leaves a dry woody taste in the mouth, very warm

What they say we should get - Oak predominates on a long, but drying, nearly hot finish. Some vanilla also peeks through

Summary

Palate loses the sweet candyness of the nose. Both Gents longed this one to taste as good as it smelt. On the nose it’s a sweet shop in a glass but all of that vanishes on tongue and is replaced by a hot peppery spice. In Jim Murray’s whisky bible 2010 he writes that if this bourbon was in a herd of 30 bourbons it would stand out by the nose alone!  He’s not wrong, although we're not sure that a herd is the collective term for a gathering of bourbons? Feel free to hit us up on twitter or in the comments if you have a better suggestion. 

We also found it very dry and you can tell this spent a lot of time in the barrel. We added a splash of water (after the scoring) to see if we could get any of the creaminess that the experts got, but personally we still didn’t experience that, if anything the water kills the taste completely.

Score

5 out of 10 - Mav

5 out of 10 – Mr. Pie

Original Review Posted - September 2016